Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Inconvenient Truths about the Parasites Making Money From "Renewables"
In case anybody has any doubts that assertions made in posters around the Scottish Low Carbon Investment Conference gravy train are in any way exagerated.
CATASTROPHIC
GLOBAL WARMING
IS A
DELIBERATE
FRAUD
PROMOTED BY THOSE IN POWER
TO GET US TO GIVE THEM
MORE POWER AND MONEY
IF THAT WERE NOT SO
IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO NAME
ONE SCIENTIST WHO
ENDORSES CATASTROPHISM
AND
ISN'T PAID OUT OF THE
PUBLIC TROUGH.
THOUSANDS OF ECOFASCISTS,
WORLDWIDE,
HAVE BEEN CHALLENGED
AND NONE HAVE BEEN ABLE
TO NAME ANYBODY
WHO DIDN'T TURN OUT EITHER TO BE
PAID BY THE STATE OR THAT
DIDN'T SUPPORT THE FRAUD
========================
ALEX
SALMOND
IS A CORRUPT, LYING,
THIEVING, PENSIONER
MURDERING FASCIST
TRAITOR
DELIBERATELY
DESTROYING
THE
SCOTTISH ECONOMY
CHRIS
HUHNE
IS A CORRUPT
LYING
PENSIONER MURDERING
CHILD RAPING
ORGANLEGGING
PRO-NAZI
WAR CRIMINAL
AL GORE
IS A LYING USELESS
CRONY
CAPITALIST
BILLIONAIRE
WANNABE
=======================
CATASTROPHIC
GLOBAL WARMING
IS A FRAUD
---------
WINDMILLS
ARE A SCAM
TO MAKE US
SUBSIDISE
THEIR PALS
-----
93%
OF EVERY
ELECTRICITY
BILL
IS TAX &
REGULATION
====
THE TRAITORS
IN GOVERNMENT
ARE STEALING
THEY ALONE
PUT US
IN RECESSION
===================
2500
PENSIONERS
DIE
UNNECESSARILY
EACH YEAR
TO SUBSIDISE
"RENEWABLES"
93% OF YOUR
ELECTRICITY BILL
IS "GREEN"
THEFT
====
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the
populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be
led to safety) by menacing it with an endless
series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
warming is simply the latest
"environmental" scare, out of
hundreds,
all of them lies
BBC KNOWINGLY LYING AND CENSORING TO PROMOTE WARMING ALARMISM
Labels: global warming, Government parasitism, Scottish politics
Comments:
<< Home
I can understand your frustration , I can see why you are angry but these outbursts are not the way to do it. Your detractors will ,in future at a time that suits them , point at these and sane ,sensible people will write you off because they don't see all of your output.
Slowly.slowly catchee monkee.
DkmcG
Slowly.slowly catchee monkee.
DkmcG
# posted by 
: September 28, 2011
: September 28, 2011
I certainly will.
What a complete ranting moron.
Here's another one, Neil:
NEIL CRAIG IS A PROVEN LIAR
WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT "HIDE THE DECLINE" MEANS.
NOR DOES HE UNDERSTAND WHAT "SIGNIFICANT WARMING" MEANS.
HE THINKS MICKEY MOUSE IS A CLIMATE SCIENTIST
HE LIED AND SLANDERED DAVID KING.
HE HAS AN IQ OF 94.
HE ADMITS HE NEVER READS SCIENCE.
YET HE STILL POSTS STUPIDITY LIKE THIS LAST ONE.
It must suck to be a madman. I almost wore myself out trying to "Go Craig" on this worthless forum.
What a complete ranting moron.
Here's another one, Neil:
NEIL CRAIG IS A PROVEN LIAR
WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT "HIDE THE DECLINE" MEANS.
NOR DOES HE UNDERSTAND WHAT "SIGNIFICANT WARMING" MEANS.
HE THINKS MICKEY MOUSE IS A CLIMATE SCIENTIST
HE LIED AND SLANDERED DAVID KING.
HE HAS AN IQ OF 94.
HE ADMITS HE NEVER READS SCIENCE.
YET HE STILL POSTS STUPIDITY LIKE THIS LAST ONE.
It must suck to be a madman. I almost wore myself out trying to "Go Craig" on this worthless forum.
# posted by : September 29, 2011
: September 29, 2011
The 2nd anon here is "Skip" from "scienceblogs" who has credibly shown that he is a "climate scientist", "peer reviewed" and "published in the finest journals".
I thibnk we must accept that the level of honesty, reason, integrity and lack of ranting that he displays represents the typical standard to be expected from "climate scientists" and therefore considerably ahead of politicians and other activists in the field.
One difference between my words and his is that mine are factual and backed up by linked previously published proof, to which there has been no factual dispute, whereas Skip's is unsupported by anything factual. Petrha[ps he would care to provide evidence of the most definitive & thus by assumption most factual, claim he makes, of my specific IQ
I thibnk we must accept that the level of honesty, reason, integrity and lack of ranting that he displays represents the typical standard to be expected from "climate scientists" and therefore considerably ahead of politicians and other activists in the field.
One difference between my words and his is that mine are factual and backed up by linked previously published proof, to which there has been no factual dispute, whereas Skip's is unsupported by anything factual. Petrha[ps he would care to provide evidence of the most definitive & thus by assumption most factual, claim he makes, of my specific IQ
My oh my . . . I think you got me good there, Beil.
I have absolutely no proof that your IQ is even as *high* as 94. I have to admit it's entirely possible you could be even dumber than that.
Well spotted--especially considering your mental disability.
Now how about you prove that David King said Antarctica would be the only habitable region by 2100?
Oh. Right. You can't. Because you're a *liar*.
Here's to hoping it's no lower than 75, mate.
I have absolutely no proof that your IQ is even as *high* as 94. I have to admit it's entirely possible you could be even dumber than that.
Well spotted--especially considering your mental disability.
Now how about you prove that David King said Antarctica would be the only habitable region by 2100?
Oh. Right. You can't. Because you're a *liar*.
Here's to hoping it's no lower than 75, mate.
# posted by : September 29, 2011
: September 29, 2011
Neil Craig is my hero ... anyone can be a critic, but it takes real guts to stand up and be counted.
Post a Comment
# posted by : November 02, 2011
: November 02, 2011 << Home
