Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Inconvenient Truths about the Parasites Making Money From "Renewables"
In case anybody has any doubts that assertions made in posters around the Scottish Low Carbon Investment Conference gravy train are in any way exagerated.
PROMOTED BY THOSE IN POWER
TO GET US TO GIVE THEM
MORE POWER AND MONEY
IF THAT WERE NOT SO
IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO NAME
ONE SCIENTIST WHO
ISN'T PAID OUT OF THE
THOUSANDS OF ECOFASCISTS,
HAVE BEEN CHALLENGED
AND NONE HAVE BEEN ABLE
TO NAME ANYBODY
WHO DIDN'T TURN OUT EITHER TO BE
PAID BY THE STATE OR THAT
DIDN'T SUPPORT THE FRAUD
IS A CORRUPT, LYING,
IS A CORRUPT
IS A LYING USELESS
IS A FRAUD
ARE A SCAM
TO MAKE US
IS TAX &
93% OF YOUR
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the
populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be
led to safety) by menacing it with an endless
series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
warming is simply the latest
"environmental" scare, out of
all of them lies
BBC KNOWINGLY LYING AND CENSORING TO PROMOTE WARMING ALARMISM
Slowly.slowly catchee monkee.
What a complete ranting moron.
Here's another one, Neil:
NEIL CRAIG IS A PROVEN LIAR
WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT "HIDE THE DECLINE" MEANS.
NOR DOES HE UNDERSTAND WHAT "SIGNIFICANT WARMING" MEANS.
HE THINKS MICKEY MOUSE IS A CLIMATE SCIENTIST
HE LIED AND SLANDERED DAVID KING.
HE HAS AN IQ OF 94.
HE ADMITS HE NEVER READS SCIENCE.
YET HE STILL POSTS STUPIDITY LIKE THIS LAST ONE.
It must suck to be a madman. I almost wore myself out trying to "Go Craig" on this worthless forum.
I thibnk we must accept that the level of honesty, reason, integrity and lack of ranting that he displays represents the typical standard to be expected from "climate scientists" and therefore considerably ahead of politicians and other activists in the field.
One difference between my words and his is that mine are factual and backed up by linked previously published proof, to which there has been no factual dispute, whereas Skip's is unsupported by anything factual. Petrha[ps he would care to provide evidence of the most definitive & thus by assumption most factual, claim he makes, of my specific IQ
I have absolutely no proof that your IQ is even as *high* as 94. I have to admit it's entirely possible you could be even dumber than that.
Well spotted--especially considering your mental disability.
Now how about you prove that David King said Antarctica would be the only habitable region by 2100?
Oh. Right. You can't. Because you're a *liar*.
Here's to hoping it's no lower than 75, mate.