Wednesday, December 16, 2009
"EVIDENCE" OF SREBRENICA MASSACRE PROVES NOTHING - ICTY REFUSE TO PRODUCE DNA EVIDENCE WHICH WOULD PROVE THE OTHER SREBRENICA MASSACRE TRUE OR NOT
De-Construct has broken important news on the alleged Srebrenica Massacre.
Dr. Ljubiša Simić, pathologist and forensic expert has gone through the evidence of the massacre presented to the defence & examined it. It certainly does not support the claim of 8,000 Moslem fighters killed, indeed it is barely compatible with the claim of former Bosnian Muslim commander Nesib Buric, in a statement to Sarajevo daily "Dani", January 18, 1999 that they themselves buried 2,000 combat casualties.
1 - Dr. Simić noted a common misconception, that 3,568 autopsy reports equal 3,568 bodies, which is not the case, even though the Hague Tribunal insists on treating it so. Around half of the total number of the Hague’s Srebrenica post-mortem reports are based on only few bones — in many cases just a single bone or bone fragment — which, simply put, “does not allow for any meaningful forensic conclusions to be drawn.
He counted the right and left femur bones, starting from the hypothesis that the femur is one of the sturdiest skeletal components and that the number of these bones is therefore one of the most reliable indicators of how many individuals were in fact buried. The results of his analysis show the presence of 1919 right and 1923 left femur bones which not only puts it under 2,000 but is a remarkably close numerical correlation between the 2 suggesting that relatively few bodies parts are missing.
2 - The forensic evidence wielded by the Hague prosecution is not accompanied by the DNA analysis, so it is entirely impossible to scientifically determine if these are remains of Bosnian Muslims, Serbs, Croats, Turks, Albanians, Arabs or some other ethnic group, or to ascertain the actual identity of the victims, save for the fact the remains belonged to the males
3 - Most remains analyzed by the NATO specialists do not allow for forensic conclusions as to the causes of death.
4 - Many of the remains taken out of a number of “Srebrenica mass graves” in 1996, for example, less than a year after the alleged Srebrenica “massacre” took place, were in a state of total decomposition, making the alleged time of death (July 1995) a scientific impossibility.
He divided the bodies into 5 classifications:
1) 442 bodies on or about which blindfolds and/or ligatures were found, which indicates that those persons were executed.
2) 655 bodies which show bullet inflicted injuries and based only upon that finding it is impossible to conclude whether they might have been executed or were killed during combat activity.
3) Of 477 it would be reasonable to conclude that they were not executed, because of the presence of shrapnel and other metal fragments which are not bullet related. That pattern of injury is consistent with combat activity, not with execution.
4) 411 So incomplete it was impossible to find the cause of death. In this group we also find bodies which did not exhibit any traces of projectiles of any kind.
5) 44,4%, or a total of 1583 consisting of only a few bones. It is clear that the reports in this category were useless for drawing conclusions of any kind
To me the worst part is not that this provides no evidence of any massacre anywhere close to the 8,000 claimed, though I accept the 442 mentioned (1) as being proof of executions, but the highlighted bit that the ICTY have refused to disclose.
This is the dog that didn't bark in the night & shows the ICTY to be in bed with the real genocide perpetrators. We know that there was genocide at Srebrenica - that of 3870 identified & named Serb villagers, men women & children but mainly women & children because the men were enlisted, in surrounding villages. This was attested to even by NATO at the Milosevic trial & Nasir Oric, the Moslem commander in charge has shown journalists video, from his extensive collection, of him murdering women & children. The ICTY claim not to have found any of them & that all bodies must be of Moslem soldiers, even the child sized ones. However DNA technology has improved to a degree not anticipated in 1995 & it is now possible to determine, with a fair degree of accuracy, the ethnicity of bodies. If the ICTY were interested in justice, or even believed it would help their case, they would long ago have tested these bodies' DNA.
The 442 bodies must be tested, by independent examiners, like the Finnish scientists who proved Racak to be combat deaths not a massacre. Until that has been done the conclusion must be that the ICTY know it would prove the alleged massacre is simply a propaganda stunt used by wholly corrupt, racist, murdering war criminals like Nazi Ashdown, whom no remotely decent human being can give any support to. After it has been done I expect that conclusion to be proved. Certainly it would be impossible for any remotely honest court to convict Karadzic if he had been refused the chance to examine such an important part of the evidence.
The "Srebrenica Massacre" has been used by openly racist pro-Nazi politicians & journalists to demonise the Serbs for 14 years, while censoring mention of the indisputable Krajina Holocaust in which, American & British officers controlled the genocide of an entire community of 250,000 people, probably killing half of them. It is obvious that no uncorrupt, non-Nazi "news" organisation has ever claimed that compared to Krajina, Srebrenica was "the worst massacre in Europe since World War II" . The evidence clearly exists to prove if it can be called the worst massacre in Srebrenica or indeed, as is most probable, if it never happened & is a NATO/Nazi propaganda lie.
I have also written a letter to the world's press on this matter. I will let you know if it gets printed but previous experience suggests the only newspapers in the English speaking world that don't censor in the Nazi cause are the Morning Star & Asia Times. Perhaps the way the MSM has discredited itself over climategate will help.
On a related matter a British magistrate has issued an arrest warrant on a Jewish politician over the Gaza war where the "IDF did more to safeguard the rights of civilians than any other army in the history of warfare". I am in 2 minds on this. On the one hand it is clearly a corrupt & racist indictment. On the other it opens the way to entirely justified warrants on our own leaders which our own corrupt & racist "law officers" have refused to issue.
You should send this evidence to Nick Cohen and see what he does when faced with evidence rather than here say and cliche's.
Slobbo's trial would have disgraced Stalin's regime
I must confess I would get a chuckle out of seeing Blair led away in handcuffs
Stalin would have produced some evidence - by any means. We do desperately need an international rule of law & we tore it up to destroy Yugoslavia.
However even when it isn't taken seriously law matters. Stalin, to prove how "democratic" the USSR was put in the constitution that the republics had the right to secede. I somehow doubt he expected anybody to be able to do it but the dissolution of the USSR came about because of that legality.
Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case
(The Documentary Secret United Nations ICC Meeting Papers Scanned Images)
This legal technicality indicates the Hague must dismiss charges against Dr karadzic
and others awaiting trials in the Hague jail; like it or not.
Unfortunately for the Signatures Of the Rome Statute United Nations member states
instituting the ICC & ICTY housed at the Hague, insofar as the, Radovan Karadzic, as
with the other Hague cases awaiting trial there, I personally witnessed these United
Nations member states openly speaking about trading judicial appointments and
verdicts for financial funding when I attended the 2001 ICC Preparatory Meetings at
the UN in Manhattan making the iCTY and ICC morally incapable trying Radovan
Karazdic and others.
I witnessed with my own eyes and ears when attending the 2001 Preparatory Meetings
to establish an newly emergent International Criminal Court, the exact caliber of
criminal corruption running so very deeply at the Hague, that it was a perfectly viable
topic of legitimate conversation in those meetings I attended to debate trading verdicts
AND judicial appointments, for monetary funding.
Jilly wrote:*The rep from Spain became distraught and when her country’s proposal
was not taken to well by the chair of the meeting , then Spain argued in a particularly
loud and noticably strongly vocal manner, “Spain (my country) strongly believes if we
contribute most financial support to the Hague’s highest court, that ought to give us and
other countries feeding it financially MORE direct power over its
((((((((((((((((((((((((( ((((((((((((((((((((((((( Instead of censoring the country representative
from Spain for even bringing up this unjust, illegal and unfair judicial idea of bribery for
international judicial verdicts and judicial appointments, all country representatives
present in the meeting that day all treated the Spain proposition as a ”totally legitimate
topic” discussed and debated it between each other for some time. I was quite shocked!
The idea was "let's discuss it." "It's a great topic to discuss."
Some countries agreed with Spain’s propositions while others did not. The point here is,
bribery for judicial verdicts and judicial appointments was treated as a totally legitimate
topic instead of an illegitimate toic which it is in the meeting that I
attended in 2001 that day to establish the ground work for a newly emergent
international criminal court.))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
In particular., since "Spain" was so overtly unafraid in bringing up this topic of trading
financial funding the ICC for influence over its future judicial appointments and verdicts
in front of every other UN member state present that day at the UN, "Spain" must have
already known by previous experience the topic of bribery was "socially acceptable" for
conversation that day. They must have previously spoke about bribing the ICTY and
before in meetings; this is my take an international sociological honor student.
SPAIN's diplomatic gesture of international justice insofar as, Serbia, in all of this is,
SPAIN HAS TAUGHT THE WORLD THE TRUE DEFINITION OF AN
"INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT."
first hand the country plenipotentiary representatives present with me discussing so
openly, trading judicial funding of a new international criminal court, for its direct
judicial appointments and judicial verdicts, those same state powers were
those same countries and people were already simultaneously, funding the already
established ICTY which was issuing at that time, arrest warrants for Bosnian Serbs
under false primary diplomatic pretenses.
The ICTY and ICC is just where it should be for once.
Cornered and backed into and an international wall, scared like a corned animal (and I
bet it reacts in the same way a rabid cornered animal does too in such circumstances).
(Evidence Agaisnt the ICTY)
(Documents: Hague war crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) has
all material evidence about the monsterous KLA Albanian/KLA organ trade in Kosovo)
I believe strongly that ICYU assocaites murdered former Serb President, Slobodan
Milosevic, tried to murder me, as well and other Serbs prisoners and presently places ,
Doctor Radovan Karadzic’s life in direct danger as well as Ratko Mladic’s life in
danger should he be brought there.
The ICTY has no other choice than to halt all further court proceedings against, Doctor
Radovan Karadzic, and others there both serving sentences and awaiting trials.
Miss JIll Louise Starr (The UN Security Council has no choice but to act on this now).
I accuse the Hague ICTY war crimes tribunal of attempted assassination on my life and
others, contempt of court and obstruction of international justice and "international
witness tampering" in complicity with Richard Holbrook and Bill Clinton (Former US
President of the USA) as well as political playersin Spain and the Netherlands .
I represented the state interests' of the Former Yugoslavia, in Darko Trifunovic’s
absence in those meetings and I am proud to undertake this effort on Serbia’s behalf.
United States :
We’ve all become closely acquainted with the concepts of impunity, international law,
social justice, and both licit and illicit equity within the framework of judiciary
1) Many news media presenters argue certain leaders of political parties and organized
crime syndicates are “arrogant,” for believing they themselves are above the rule of law.
However, the award for winning the Olympic Gold Metal of being ‘Mother of All
Arrogance’ has just be captured by Hague’s Highest Legal Entity, the newly constructed
International Criminal Court.
2) This entity shamelessly and explicitly proclaims its own impunity from international
justice while increasing its push moving forward in prosecuting others for identical
crimes itself commits. It flaunts its diplomatic immunity as if it were the President of the
most powerful country on earth. Claiming to rival the powers of the Queen of England
and the Holy See.