A Place to Stand

   We were recently told that 1 of the 2 most serious charges against Radovan Karadzic has been dropped due to the lack of any evidence whatsoever. This was the charge of genocide early in the war. What is not disputable is that there was deliberate racial genocide at that stage - the fighting started when Moslem Nazi militia shot up a wedding party in Sarajevo purely for racial reasons. legally that is undeniably genocide and that is why the NATO controlled court demonstrated the very highest standard of honesty to which NATO politicians and lawyers ever aspire by ensuring that these Nazis guilty of genocide were brought to a real trial well rewarded with cushy jobs as apparatchiks in the Nazi regime NATO imposed on Bosnia.

    The other serious charge against Karadzic was for "genocide" at Srebrenica. In fact the only genocide at Srebrenica was the murder of 3,870 identified Serb civilians in surrounding villages - it was possible for Nasir Oric, the  Moslem Nazi commander in Srebrenica to commit these massacres and later show friendly journalists the films of him beheading women and children, only because NATO helped him.

     The facts of his massacre are undisputed, having been testified to by among others, the NATO commander in Bosnia at the time, during the Milosevic "trial". Being pivotal to ant reporting of that war they have been widely reported by every single broadcaster and newspaper in Britain and America not both wholly corrupt and controlled by genocide promoting Nazis. Unfortunately there are zero newspapers and broadcasters in Britain and America not wholly corrupt and controlled by Nazis.

  However proving himself innocent of this non-existent massacre at Srebrenica is likely to prove impossible since the NATO funded "court" have previously ruled that it did happen and they don't need no stinking evidence on the subject.

    The charges against him were

Count 1: Genocide. – Municipalities: Bratunac, Foča, Ključ, Kotor Varoš, Prijedor, Sanski Most, Vlasenica and Zvornik.
Count 2: Genocide. – Municipality: Srebrenica.
Count 3: Persecutions on Political, Racial and Religious Grounds, a Crime Against Humanity. – Municipalities: Banja Luka, Bijeljina, Bosanska Krupa, Bosanski Novi, Bratunac, Brčko, Foča, Hadžići, Ilidža, Kalinovik, Ključ, Kotor Varoš, Novi Grad, Novo Sarajevo, Pale, Prijedor, Rogatica, Sanski Most, Sokolac, Trnovo, Vlasenica, Vogošća, Zvornik and Srebrenica.
Count 4: Extermination, a Crime Against Humanity.
Count 5: Murder, a Crime Against Humanity.
Count 6: Murder, a Violation of the Laws or Customs of War.
Count 7: Deportation, a Crime Against Humanity.
Count 8: Inhumane Acts (forcible transfer), a Crime Against Humanity.
Count 9: Acts of Violence the Primary Purpose of which is to Spread Terror among the Civilian Population, a Violation of the Laws or Customs of War.
Count 10: Unlawful Attacks on Civilians, a Violation of the Laws or Customs of War.
Count 11: Taking of Hostages, a Violation of the Laws or Customs of War. The Yugoslav war crimes court,however, rejected on 27 June 2012 one of the two genocide charges against the Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic.

  Count 1 having been dropped & 2 being clearly fraudulent we are left with killings, persecution and deportation.  With the deportations of immigrant workers which happened & are happening under the NATO sponsored regime in Libya there is absolutely nothing there that all the NATO leaders are not undeniably personally complicit in. Indeed there are many other crimes, such as torture and rape which NATO leaders are all complicit in in Libya ed which they also assisted in on the Moslem Nazi side inn Bosnia (Oric for example, though not "tried" for his genocide, was "tried" for torture, found guilty and immediately released).  This is why our judicial authorities, not being wholly corrupt racist Nazi whores have charged all none of our politicians involved with such crimes.

   This represents the highest standard of honesty to which any of our judges and lawyers ever aspire.

As an example of our lawyer's standard of honesty look at Vasislav Seselj, who, 2 weeks before he was clearly about the win the Serbian election was "indicted" on absolutely no evidence. He surrendered voluntarily to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia on 24 February 2003 and has been imprisoned ever since.

He turned himself in in February 2003 after the ICTY indicted him on eight counts of crimes against humanity yet none of these charges has been proven in court. Seselj had spent more than four years in detention before a trial against him even began and, three months later, just seven hours before the prosecution’s time ran out, the Seselj case was suspended for another 11 months.

   His first "trial" was then stopped shortly before it was about to conclude with the prosecution having been unable to produce evidence against him and if it were a court of law, a not guilty verdict being inevitable. The prosecution were authorised to start again. The second "trial" is in a permanent of nothing happening.

    From time to time the British and American media run a news story about somebody imprisoned without due process in which they parade their allegedly "liberal" sympathies - whether it be Abu Qatada or An San Suu Kyi. If any of those news selections were honestly based on the facts the imprisonment, without real trial, by the American, British and other governments, for nearly 10 years do far, of somebody who would otherwise have been a head of state would have received far more coverage than either of those 2.

  The Burmese leader's equally wrongful imprisonment, but not by us, would have had maybe a 1/10th as much coverage (102,000 items on Google)  compared to Seselj's (6,200 items but overwhelmingly not from Anglo/American media). Proof positive that our media is as corrupt and Nazi as our obscene, racist, genocidal, child raping, organlegging Nazi party leaders and judges.