Wednesday, January 01, 2014
28 Gate Revisited - 1,000 Letters On The Subject Censored
Zero in 1,000, when the letters are written moderately competently is not a record even the North Korean media could exceed. It is obviously statistically impossible without massive de facto censorship across our entire mainstream media.
The extent to which 28 Gate has been made, in an entirely Orwellian way, has been deleted from the news record is frankly scary.
We have just passed the 1st anniversary of it being proven that the BBC had, for 6 years, then, continuously and repeatedly lied to promote their censorship of any dissent over the alleged catastrophic global warming consensus. The BBC had claimed to have the support for this of "28 leading scientists", from across the world at a symposium held by them. Helen Boaden, then on suspension over the Saville affair but since promoted to be head of BBC Radio, said under oath, in a court case brought because the BBC refused to identify them, even testified that they were not only leading scientists but that they had been selected for their "multiplicity of views".
Then the list of names came out and it was revealed they were not 28 of the world's leading scientists. 26 of them weren't scientists at all. Nor were they selected for "multiplicity of views". Every one was an activist, almost all paid by the state. Climate activists, renewables salespeople, 3rd world "aid" activists, and for higher authority a Church of England cleric and a psychological warfare expert from the US embassy.
The news of this fraud was, obviously, never reported by the BBC. It still hasn't been. More ominously it got little coverage in newspapers, and what there was being almost all by the more trustworthy commenters, who get to choose what they write, rather than in "news" pages.
And our police, who spend many millions building cases against NOTW reporters and Tommy Sheriden, not only refuse to investigate what appears to be an open and shut case of perjury by Helen Boaden, they refuse even to say why not.
We may read, in our papers the scandals, lies and airbrushing by the North Korean regime. Would it not be desirable for us to learn of what must be assumed to be worse lies and atrocities of western powers?
Links for 28 Gate
Initial report http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/principia-scientific-has-interesting.html
ThinkScotland article http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/to-bbc-director-general-tony-hall-open.html
Boaden's perjury reported to police - forwarded to the Met who refuse to comment http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/bbc-perjury-case-for-28-gate-police.html
How Red Nose Day charitable funding was used to promote the fraud http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/principia-scientific-has-interesting.html
Reaches 864 letters http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/unpublished-letters-proof-of-deliberate.html
Last letter to another 40 http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/letters-unpublished-in-septemberearly.html
Censorship worse than NK
Genuine, atrocities carried out by NATO worse than North Korea's and unreported by our media - dissection thousands of living people to steal body organs
and massacre of at least 210 by our "police" http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.co.uk/2008/01/dragodan-massacre-freedom-of_23.html