Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Irrefutability - On Ed Davey & The "Libdems"Being Corrupt
It is fair to say that trust in politicians is not something the public has in abundance.
That is why, when it comes to climate change, it is so important that all the rigours of the scientific method are applied.
... We heard earlier from the Chief Scientist Sir John Beddington, and from other distinguished guests about the overwhelming scientific evidence for climate change.
Overwhelming evidence, yes....
Two hundred years of good science - teasing out uncertainties, considering risk - has laid the foundation of what we now understand.
It screams out from decade upon decade of research.
The basic physics of climate change is irrefutable.
Greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere and cause changes to the climate.
Human activity is significantly contributing to the warming of our planet....
Because the stark fact is this – climate change is happening.
We can’t reverse it, but we can limit it.
AVOID highlights the importance of keeping temperature increases below 2C
To do so global emissions need to be reduced urgently and sustained deep cuts are required long term....
We can all be proud of the Climate Change Act of 2008 - the first comprehensive economy wide climate legislation of its kind.
Committing the UK to achieve at least an 80% cut in carbon emissions by 2050....
But as the Prime Minister set out last week, reaffirming our shared commitment to being the greenest government ever:
“We are in a global race and the countries that succeed in that race, the economies that will prosper, are those that are the greenest and the most energy efficient.”
AVOID has shown that to achieve a 50% chance of limiting warming to 2°C, global emissions need to peak in the next few years and be followed by rapid long-term reductions.
Thanks to programmes like AVOID the science, the risks, the impacts and the way ahead have never been clearer.
You know, when I am confronted by some of the most dogmatic and blinkered people who deny that climate change is happening, I am reminded of the sentiment of the famous USA Today cartoon.
“If we really are wrong about climate change, we will have created a better world for nothing”.
In reality, those who deny climate change and demand a halt to emissions reduction and mitigation work, want us to take a huge gamble with the future of every human being on the planet, every future human being, our children and grand children, and every other living species.
We will not take that risk.
With the exception of the first 2 lines about the lack of trust in politicians (at least politicians like him) and the need for real science I don'y thjink there is anything there that is, as he claims, "irrifutable".
Indeed I don't think there is anything that is not clearly and deliberately dishonest. Anything that undicates a personal level of integrity of Mr Davey in any way greater than that of the late Dr Goebbels.
I sent this to the Pseudo-LibDem party and a number of prominent members
Ed Davey is to speak to a Royal Society seminar today on the subject of climate change. Apparently he will argue that
"the science of climate change is "irrefutable" and man is making a "significant" contribution to rising global temperatures."
Clearly it is possible to refute that claim, if only because there is currently no rising global temperature.
By definition if something Mr Davy, knowingly claims to be irrefutable isn't then it becomes irrefutable that Ed Davy is a corrupt liar whose word can never be automatically taken on any subject whatsoever.
In turn I ask your party to publicly dissociate yourselves from his claim. Or alternately to prove that currently there is such warming; that there could be no other possible explanation (e.g. solar cycles) which could have such influence; and that you have "irrefutable" proof of this.
Obviously the only possible remaining alternative, which if you do not do either of the first 2, would automatically be irrefutable, is that it is not only Mr Davy that is a corrupt liar who can never be trusted to tell the truth, it is the "Liberal Democratic" party who knowingly endorse such deliberate lies as well.
I await seeing if any of you will choose either of the 1st 2 options or, by default, endorse the 3rd and prove yourselves, one and all, corrupt lying fraudsters.
I am in no way surprised to be able to say irrefutably that not a single one of them has been able to substantiate a single thing he said and that thus every single one of them knows CAGW to be a lie. That the entire party is irrefutably corrupt and lying. That irrefutably the entire party are obscene, thieving, child abusing, murdering Fascist scum. As, irrefutably, is any beeboid, whorrnalist or other Labnatcongreen cartel member who denies it. No offence to more traditional Fascists gor being linked to parasites like this.