Saturday, October 27, 2012
Global Warming Debate - Tuesday 7.30
Neil Craig (UKIP Glasgow)
"This meeting believes there is no evidence of catastrophic warming remotely as catastrophic as the regulations, taxes and other costs imposed to ameliorate it".
On the upper floor of Yates. 134-136 West George Street
Tuesday 30th October 7 00 for a 7.30 start.
Speakers for the motion:
Andy Montford (Bishop Hill blogger) , author Hiding the decline & The Hockey stick Illusion
Jim Sillars, former SNP Deputy Leader
Lord Monckton, UKIP
Unfortunately not a single Scottish MSP (who voted unanimously to impose the most restrictive and expensive "global warming" legislation in the world is willing to speak for their alleged beliefs.
Nor a single employee of the various quangos and government funded fakecharities (Scottish Renewables, Carbon Trust, WWF, BBC etc) who receive £ billions to promote the scare. However questions will be taken from the audience so you are going to get a far more honest debate than will ever see on the BBC
List of Global Warming Alarmists who refuse to debate the warming claims they are using to take hundreds of billions of £s from us.
All 129 MSPs
All 5 party organisations
Scottish Natural Heritage
Scottish Civil Service
The Carbon Trust
NERC (a quango you've never heard of but it gets £500 million a year to promote alarmism & did previously call for a debate)
Any of the 5,000 RenewablesUK Conference attendees in Glasgow that day to "network" for windmillery"business opportunities"
Friends of the Earth
Stop Climate Change Scotland (an umbrella organisation covering around 90 other alarmist groups)
Professor Ann Glover (former Chief Scientific Adviser to the Scottish government, now to the entire EU, who once claimed that global warming would increase day length)
Royal Society of Edinburgh
and some individuals we won't embarrass by naming.
Between them these get several billions a year to promote alarmism
Also Glasgow University
Glasgow Caledonian University
Glasgow Skeptics (spelled that way to avoid being confused with sceptics)
The environmental correspondents across the Scottish press
By all the rules of public debate when one party withdraws the other wins by default.
By all logic this unanimity of the warming alarmist community statistically proves they know the catastrophic warming scare story is a fraud to keep us obedient & willing to pay more taxes and ever higher electricity bills & that it simply cannot survive free debate.
It also shows most of the MSPs & state funded propagandists who ever appear on the state owned broadcaster know that on the BBC there will be no free speech - that any appearance will be slanted and censored on their behalf & dissidents banned.
If the BBC wishes to become the "balanced" news reporter their charter requires, rather than a totalitarian propagandist and censor, UKIP guarantees to produce speakers any time they want to allow free debate and end their censorship.