Friday, July 22, 2011
The Birth Certificate Obama Produced was an "Irrefutable" Forgery
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Sir Humphrey Appleby, John Pilger and Otto von Bismark
I had always thought that the idea that Obama hadn't really been born in the US and so was constitutionally debarred from being President, was a bit unlikely.
When Donald Trump made a big issue of it he looked like publicity seeking.
When Obama's office then officially produced records of his birth being certified that seemed to end it, even though it left the obvious question of why he had not done this years ago or indeed why he had not been required to.
'Irrefutable' proof of Obama forgery
Document details show typewriter had variable type way back in 1961?Unless the typewriter used to type Barack Obama's purported Hawaiian "Certificate of Live Birth" in 1961 was magically capable of producing different size and shaped images with the exact same key, the document released by the White House April 27 is a forgery, says a professional typographer with 50 years experience.
"Steel-stamped letters do not expand to larger sizes and morph into different styles of type," retired New York City typographer Paul Irey told WND.
As WND previously reported, it would be impossible for the different letters that appear in the Obama birth certificate to have been typed by one typewriter, according to Irey.
Jerome Corsi's new book, "Where's the Birth Certificate?", is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore
"These are irrefutable proofs of forgery," he said.
If the real thing exists it would not have been necessary to forge it. Therefore it doesn't. Obama has officially denied the story and been caught lying doing so.
I happen to think this is important. That the rule of law is vital to any country and that it has been broken by Obama, almost certainly with the connivance of people who ignored the question when he first stood and certainly involving a criminal conspiracy of the forgers now. If the Constitution, the basis of America, isn't maintained then there is no Constitution.
I suspect it will be ignored, just as Clinton's blatant ignoring of both the Constitution and the War Powers Act during the Kosovo war (both of which require Congressional approval for war, for very good constitutional reasons).
This our convention understood to be the most oppressive of all kingly oppressions, and they resolved to so frame the Constitution that no one man should hold the power of bringing this oppression upon us. But your view destroys the whole matter, and places our President where kings have always stood.
Much of the fault for such things must go not to the perpetrator but to Congressmen and lawyers who have found it easier to ignore their duty to maintain the Constitution and even moreso the media to who coined the term "investigative journalism" because they do not realise their is no honest journalism that is not investigative.. Crimes of omission are much less than those of commission but are usually done with proportionately even less incentive too.
