Click to get your own widget

Friday, July 09, 2010

TECHNOLOGY OPTION SUPPRESSED BY POLITICS


veteran Soviet physicist Viktor Mikhailov knows just how to fix BP's oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico.

"A nuclear explosion over the leak," he says nonchalantly puffing a cigarette as he sits in a conference room at the Institute of Strategic Stability, where he is a director. "I don't know what BP is waiting for, they are wasting their time. Only about 10 kilotons of nuclear explosion capacity and the problem is solved."...

Ordinarily he's an opponent of nuclear blasts, but he says an underwater explosion in the Gulf of Mexico would not be harmful and could cost no more than $10 million. That compares with the $2.35 billion BP has paid out in cleanup and compensation costs so far. "This option is worth the money," he says.

And it's not just Soviet boffins. Milo Nordyke, one of the masterminds behind U.S. research into peaceful nuclear energy in the 1960s and '70s says a nuclear explosion is a logical last-resort solution for BP and the government. Matthew Simmons, a former energy adviser to U.S. President George W. Bush and the founder of energy investment-banking firm Simmons & Company International, is another calling for the nuclear option...

Nordyke says fears that radiation could escape after the explosion are unfounded. The hole would be about 8 inches in diameter and, despite the shockwave, the radiation should remain captured. Even in the case of radiation escape, he says, its dispersed effect would be less than that of floating oil patches

I don't personally know whether this is the optimum response or overdoing it. What I do know is that society being as averse to anything new & anything nuclear there is no chance it will get allowed even if it is. Refusing to look at the options is worse than choosing the 2nd best. It is yet another way in which our society is shying away from any sort of progress.

We know that the claim that radiation at low levels, is dangerous is simply a complete lie which its proponents have been unable to produce any evidence whatsoever to support. In fact at low levels the hormesis theory, that it is beneficial has a large amount of evidence supporting it.

It was different once, before the eco-fascists were given a veto on any actions.
Washington had big plans to use peaceful nuclear explosions to build an additional Panama Canal, carve a path for an inter-state highway through mountains in the Mojave Desert and connect underwater aquifers in Arizona. But the experimental plans were dropped as authorities learned more about the ecological dangers of surface explosions.

The Soviet program, known as Nuclear Explosions for the National Economy, was launched in 1958. The project saw 124 nuclear explosions for such tasks as digging canals and reservoirs, creating underground storage caverns for natural gas and toxic waste, exploiting oil and gas deposits and sealing gas leaks. It was finally mothballed by Mikhail Gorbachev in 1989.

The Soviets first used a nuclear blast to seal a gas leak in 1966. Urtabulak, one of its prized gas-fields in Uzbekistan, had caught fire and raged for three years. Desperate to save the cherished reserves, Yefim Slavsky, then Minister of Light Industry, ordered nuclear engineers to use the most powerful weapon in their arsenal.

"The Minister said, 'Do it. Put it out. Explode it,'"
Of course the eco-fascists have their spokesmen too
Vladimir Chuprov from Greenpeace's Moscow office is even more insistent that BP not heed the advice of the veteran Soviet physicists. Chuprov disputes the veterans' accounts of the peaceful explosions and says several of the gas leaks reappeared later. "What was praised as a success and a breakthrough by the Soviet Union is in essence a lie," he says. "I would recommend that the international community not listen to the Russians. Especially those of them that offer crazy ideas. Russians are keen on offering things, especially insane things."

I doubt if Greenpeace's Russian division is funded from Russia. The irony of hiring a Russian spokesman, who is guaranteed so much more coverage in the western media than any indigenous Russian activist would get, to say not to trust Russians is obviously lost on them

The world is built on crazy ideas that worked.

PS Jerry Pournelle has also noted this.

Labels: , ,


Comments:
Interesting discussion …I felt obliged to share this with u guys. There is website called www.democracymatters.info, the above discussions also covered in detail on this website. This web-portal aims to support communication, co-operation and learning among organisations and networks concerned about democracy so that citizens have an effective say in how society is run.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

British Blogs.