Sunday, April 05, 2009
"INCONVENIENT TRUTH" - Already proven in court to be a pack of lies
Channel 4 Chair
Dear Luke Johnson,
I note that last night C4 broadcast Al Gore's film officially called "An Inconvenient Truth" and colloquially and more accurately "A Pack of Convenient lies By a Wholly Corrupt Genocidal Child Raping Fascist War Criminal Who Spent $4 Million on His Beachfront House".
As you will be aware this propaganda piece has the unique honour of having been proven, in a British court, to contain many lies namely:
- The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government’s expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
- The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
- The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that it was “not possible” to attribute one-off events to global warming.
- The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that this was not the case.
- The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant’s evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
- The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
- The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
- The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.
There are also matters of opinion on which the film has since been proven wrong - such as that global warming would continue. In fact, as you doubtless know global temperature has declined since filming. The same applies to the increase in hurricanes following Katrina which he promised & though the opposite has happened. And so on. There were also things which, while not untrue, were misleading such as the use of a Mercator projection map of Greenland which showed it larger than central Canada though that is not the case in reality.
Some parts of the film may be true may be true. For example it was asserted that Mr Gore used to have a dog - though whether this & other emotional moments are relevant to the "scientific" claims he was making is questionable.
I do not dispute the propriety of C4 showing this farrago of lies because it is important that you put alternative views. However putting alternative views, rather than merely engaging in propaganda lies, requires that alternative views be put. I must ask when you will be giving equally prime time coverage to a similar lecture by Professor Singer, Viscount Monkton or indeed anybody with better scientific credentials than Gore & alternative views, on this subject?
The traditional, still best & I think most entertaining, way of reaching conclusions on such subjects would be a formal debate. Unfortunately Mr Gore has never felt that actually debating the case would help him & has been in the fortunate position of being given a free unrestrained run by the media for what he says, even when it has been proven to contain lies. Anyway having suggested this before I know that C4 (& to be fair the rest of Britain's broadcasters) are wholly opposed to free debate.
Incidentally since you approve of giving a coverage to controversial views may I ask when you will be broadcasting the film "It Started With A Lie: Nato Aggression against Serbia 1999" which, while putting a controversial view has the great advantage of being wholly truthful. I know that C4 believe in censoring from your news any mention of such things ar the Dragodan Massacre or the even more obscene kidnapping & dissection, while alive, of thousands of Serb teenagers to steal their body organs, carried out by NATO "police" but clearly if C4 ever wishes to be considered in any way honest or impartial, or even not fascist, in at least its non-news items you will be eager to ensure a balance there at least.
I await your reply.
Neil Craig
Any reply will be published, though experience shows C$ do not respond to complaints.
Hat tip to Joshua Rosenberg for pointing me to the German film
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI4kz8CSYmA
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeRXLw4nUhI
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kuhfyd6bJs
Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kR_xlhnSJEw
Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvS5sXlkMys
Dear Luke Johnson,
I note that last night C4 broadcast Al Gore's film officially called "An Inconvenient Truth" and colloquially and more accurately "A Pack of Convenient lies By a Wholly Corrupt Genocidal Child Raping Fascist War Criminal Who Spent $4 Million on His Beachfront House".
As you will be aware this propaganda piece has the unique honour of having been proven, in a British court, to contain many lies namely:
- The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government’s expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
- The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
- The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that it was “not possible” to attribute one-off events to global warming.
- The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that this was not the case.
- The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant’s evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
- The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
- The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
- The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.
There are also matters of opinion on which the film has since been proven wrong - such as that global warming would continue. In fact, as you doubtless know global temperature has declined since filming. The same applies to the increase in hurricanes following Katrina which he promised & though the opposite has happened. And so on. There were also things which, while not untrue, were misleading such as the use of a Mercator projection map of Greenland which showed it larger than central Canada though that is not the case in reality.
Some parts of the film may be true may be true. For example it was asserted that Mr Gore used to have a dog - though whether this & other emotional moments are relevant to the "scientific" claims he was making is questionable.
I do not dispute the propriety of C4 showing this farrago of lies because it is important that you put alternative views. However putting alternative views, rather than merely engaging in propaganda lies, requires that alternative views be put. I must ask when you will be giving equally prime time coverage to a similar lecture by Professor Singer, Viscount Monkton or indeed anybody with better scientific credentials than Gore & alternative views, on this subject?
The traditional, still best & I think most entertaining, way of reaching conclusions on such subjects would be a formal debate. Unfortunately Mr Gore has never felt that actually debating the case would help him & has been in the fortunate position of being given a free unrestrained run by the media for what he says, even when it has been proven to contain lies. Anyway having suggested this before I know that C4 (& to be fair the rest of Britain's broadcasters) are wholly opposed to free debate.
Incidentally since you approve of giving a coverage to controversial views may I ask when you will be broadcasting the film "It Started With A Lie: Nato Aggression against Serbia 1999" which, while putting a controversial view has the great advantage of being wholly truthful. I know that C4 believe in censoring from your news any mention of such things ar the Dragodan Massacre or the even more obscene kidnapping & dissection, while alive, of thousands of Serb teenagers to steal their body organs, carried out by NATO "police" but clearly if C4 ever wishes to be considered in any way honest or impartial, or even not fascist, in at least its non-news items you will be eager to ensure a balance there at least.
I await your reply.
Neil Craig
Any reply will be published, though experience shows C$ do not respond to complaints.
Hat tip to Joshua Rosenberg for pointing me to the German film
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI4kz8CSYmA
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeRXLw4nUhI
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kuhfyd6bJs
Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kR_xlhnSJEw
Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvS5sXlkMys
Comments:
<< Home
- The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that it was “not possible” to attribute one-off events to global warming.
All problems that befall US Blacks are the result of Evil Whitey, and therefore are proof of the need to End Racism Now - otherwise known as socialism. A good example of the use of Blacks to advance the anti-American, socialist agenda is the group Act Now to Stop War and End Racism (ANSWER). For these crypto-commies Katrina was a gift from comrade Stalin. I don't know why we claim to have won the Cold War, the Left continues its long march.
- The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
I remember reading a hysterical article that used Bangladesh as an example of 150 million people that supposedly were going to be displaced by Global Warming and would have "no choice" but to move to the West...and vote for whatever leftist parties that are available locally.
Paul Craig Roberts had it right. During the Cold War the Soviet Union realized that coloreds outnumbered Whites and decided to use them against the White West, by telling them that they were poor because they were oppressed. Despite a minor setback in the early 90's with the collapse of the SU, the Left continues to use this stategy successfully to destroy any right wing holdout.
Global Warming is just another way for the Left to cry that evil, "rich" whitey is harming the third world. Mysteriously all of these examples of people being forced from their homes are in the third world. Helping Africa (and India) by ruling it doesn't seem to have been worth it.
All problems that befall US Blacks are the result of Evil Whitey, and therefore are proof of the need to End Racism Now - otherwise known as socialism. A good example of the use of Blacks to advance the anti-American, socialist agenda is the group Act Now to Stop War and End Racism (ANSWER). For these crypto-commies Katrina was a gift from comrade Stalin. I don't know why we claim to have won the Cold War, the Left continues its long march.
- The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
I remember reading a hysterical article that used Bangladesh as an example of 150 million people that supposedly were going to be displaced by Global Warming and would have "no choice" but to move to the West...and vote for whatever leftist parties that are available locally.
Paul Craig Roberts had it right. During the Cold War the Soviet Union realized that coloreds outnumbered Whites and decided to use them against the White West, by telling them that they were poor because they were oppressed. Despite a minor setback in the early 90's with the collapse of the SU, the Left continues to use this stategy successfully to destroy any right wing holdout.
Global Warming is just another way for the Left to cry that evil, "rich" whitey is harming the third world. Mysteriously all of these examples of people being forced from their homes are in the third world. Helping Africa (and India) by ruling it doesn't seem to have been worth it.
# posted by 
: April 06, 2009
: April 06, 2009
I think the European powers are more responsible for encouraging "leftists" taking over 3rd world countries. Despite all the Marxist doctrine about the need for colonies they were always an expense rather than abenefit & at the end of WW2 countries were pleased to get rid of them & "letist" politicians best placed to take over. I don't think the USSR was ever doing much but fishing in their enemies' troubled waters. Whatever Mugabe's surface politics virtually all African & Islamic politics is about tribalism to which communism is completely irrelvent. In the same way King George's war (the Seven Years War to us) was about British, French & other European rivalry & nominally about who had the right to inherit Silesia but it didn't stop both sides paying Red Indians to fight.
Post a Comment
<< Home
