Tuesday, February 27, 2007
BOSNIA - THE HAGUE VERDICT
Today's Scotsman
Either the court was corrupt in deciding that they couldn't rule on NATO's bombing of Yugoslavia because Yugoslavia had been expelled from the UN or the court was corrupt in deciding that they could rule in this case though Bosnia was not & never had been a member of the UN. There is no 3rd alternative.
Once again we have the Srebrenica lie brought out & subjected to no actual investigation. In fact the primary & probably inly genocide there was that of at least 3,800 Serb villagers, mainly women, old people & children, by Naser Oric the Moslem commander, who showed journalists his home videos of him beheading civilians. That, since it involved civilians not soldiers, was undoubtedly legally genocide & was carried out with the presence & indeed complicity of Dutch troops under the UN flag. There is no question whatsoever that this happened, even general Marrillon, the NATO commander on the scene testified to it at the Milosevic trial. This is fully accepted & reported by every newspaper & TV journalist who is not a wholly corrupt, racist, holocaust denying, pro-Nazi liar. Unfortunately that includes no significant number of UK journalists. On one occasion I sent a letter on the refusal of the ICTY to indict Oric for this to every major Scottish, UK & several US papers. It was published only by the Morning Star & I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge that that is the only liberal or indeed honest newspaper of the lot.
In which case it is the Dutch, not Yugoslavs, who are guilty of complicity in genocide.
Note that the "official" massacre story started when Izerbegovic, our openly genocidal Nazi Moslem ally claimed that all 7,500 of the garrison had disappeared. It subsequently turned out that at least 7,000 of them reached Moslem lines & were secretly, not even being allowed to write to relatives, transferred to the Tuzla front. Izetbegovic later claimed to have been told just before by the US that he needed a massacre of 5,000 people to justify NATO bombing. to make this fit the original garrison has been retroactively doubled. The article also claims that "nearly half the bodies have been found" (a considerable overestimate) but doesn't mention that most of them have been found near the villages where Oric's genocide (which is also censored) happened (none of whose bodies have officially been found). It is obvious that these bodies, many of them of children, which are the only serious forensic evidence of any genocide, are much more likely to be those of Serb men women & chidren rather than Moslem soldiers.
The Hague court has totally discredited itself by this purely political decision to blame the Serbs, but not to such an extent as to intefere with EU plans.
I have also commented on this in the Guardian
SERBIA did not commit genocide against Bosnia during the 1992-5 war, the United Nation's highest court has ruled in a landmark case - but it said that the country had violated its responsibility to prevent genocide......A wholly corrupt verdict from an openly racist "court".
Judge Rosalyn Higgins, the ICJ president, said the court concluded that the 1995 Srebrenica massacre of thousands of Bosnian Muslim men and boys did constitute genocide, but that other mass killings of Bosnian Muslims did not.....
Some 8,000 Muslims from Srebrenica and surrounding villages in eastern Bosnia were killed in July 1995. The bodies of almost half of them have been found in more than 80 mass graves nearby.
Either the court was corrupt in deciding that they couldn't rule on NATO's bombing of Yugoslavia because Yugoslavia had been expelled from the UN or the court was corrupt in deciding that they could rule in this case though Bosnia was not & never had been a member of the UN. There is no 3rd alternative.
Once again we have the Srebrenica lie brought out & subjected to no actual investigation. In fact the primary & probably inly genocide there was that of at least 3,800 Serb villagers, mainly women, old people & children, by Naser Oric the Moslem commander, who showed journalists his home videos of him beheading civilians. That, since it involved civilians not soldiers, was undoubtedly legally genocide & was carried out with the presence & indeed complicity of Dutch troops under the UN flag. There is no question whatsoever that this happened, even general Marrillon, the NATO commander on the scene testified to it at the Milosevic trial. This is fully accepted & reported by every newspaper & TV journalist who is not a wholly corrupt, racist, holocaust denying, pro-Nazi liar. Unfortunately that includes no significant number of UK journalists. On one occasion I sent a letter on the refusal of the ICTY to indict Oric for this to every major Scottish, UK & several US papers. It was published only by the Morning Star & I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge that that is the only liberal or indeed honest newspaper of the lot.
In which case it is the Dutch, not Yugoslavs, who are guilty of complicity in genocide.
Note that the "official" massacre story started when Izerbegovic, our openly genocidal Nazi Moslem ally claimed that all 7,500 of the garrison had disappeared. It subsequently turned out that at least 7,000 of them reached Moslem lines & were secretly, not even being allowed to write to relatives, transferred to the Tuzla front. Izetbegovic later claimed to have been told just before by the US that he needed a massacre of 5,000 people to justify NATO bombing. to make this fit the original garrison has been retroactively doubled. The article also claims that "nearly half the bodies have been found" (a considerable overestimate) but doesn't mention that most of them have been found near the villages where Oric's genocide (which is also censored) happened (none of whose bodies have officially been found). It is obvious that these bodies, many of them of children, which are the only serious forensic evidence of any genocide, are much more likely to be those of Serb men women & chidren rather than Moslem soldiers.
The Hague court has totally discredited itself by this purely political decision to blame the Serbs, but not to such an extent as to intefere with EU plans.
I have also commented on this in the Guardian
Comments:
<< Home
Remids me of when the NATO funded "court" said that they had relied on NATO statements as evidence in deciding whether the war was legal etc.
Just so long as all the government funded "N"GOs agree we need not let mere facts intervene.
Post a Comment
Just so long as all the government funded "N"GOs agree we need not let mere facts intervene.
<< Home
