Monday, December 04, 2006
I have, for the 2nd time been banned from the C4 News discussion group for the crimes of not accepting the guilt of Milosevic, sea level rise, that our own leaders are not war criminals & for posting on a banned subject (though I couldn't know it was banned at the time).
Dear C4 Communities,
In response to the decision of Channel 4 to prevent my participation in your news discussion group, yet again, may I confirm that I still consider C4 to be the best news provider on terrestrial UK television, though it must be admitted the competition isn't tough. May I also thank you for this time at least having the common courtesy to confirm why I was censored. Last time I received no explanation though I suspect it was because I had dared to mention that in the ITN vs LM "concentration camp video" even the judge, in summing up for ITN confirmed that ITN had indeed faked the video representing the most important single news story ever broken by them but that LM had erred in failing to bring to their reader's attention the possibility that ITN had been accidentally faking.
I thought this unfair since I had gone to considerable lengths to say that the video was allegedly "accidentally" faked & that ITN had conceivably accidentally failed to notice when it was used wrongly to suggest the existence of a concentration camp & conceivably accidentally not noticed when George Bush used it to support illegal war & conceivable not noticed when the judge said it was faked & conceivably not noticed in each of the succeeding years when ITN did not withdraw their conceivably accidental lie.
Since this has now undeniably been brought to ITN's attention it is, of course, inconceivable that you will be unable to apologise for this allegedly accidental lie this week.
Your current gagging is because of 5 instances.
1) I disputed vociferously that Milosevic was guilty with somebody who made the most outrageous claims, repeatedly & repeatedly refused to produce evidence. I remind you that the legal position is that ANYBODY is innocent until proven guilty & that, due to his murder in custody, Milosevic remains legally innocent. Your action is thus not merely censorship but flies in the face of our legal tradition. If this is your official position C4, or its employees, could not object if somebody, for example, accused John Snow of kidnapping raping & murdering dozens of pre-schoolers purely because there is no evidence. The other disputant was not banned despite what he said being clearly hundreds of times more offensive than anything I did.
2) I accepted that a statement made by another party that there had been no blood test of Milosevic containing rifampcin represented his standard of honesty. Considering that such a test exists & did show poison I believe my remark was as restrained as possible without disputing the proven facts. Since you have said that I may rejoin if "posts of this nature will not occur again" I must ask you what form of words would be within your code & truthful at the same time?
3) I asked a disputant to withdraw the claim that we are currently experiencing a 300 foot sea level rise & the claim that Stephen McIntyre had not shown the mathematics of the Hockey Stick theory of global warming nonviable. Since we aren't & he has I ask again what form of words would be within your code & still truthful?
4) That I attempted to put up a thread relating to the massive & spectacular attack & explosions in Camp Falcon, Iraq which you decided should be censored. One of the problems with censorship is that it is, by it's nature, difficult to tell that a subject has been censored because discussion is censored. Short of C4 publishing a list of subjects censored from C4 discussion I cannot see how it would have been possible for me to pre-censor myself. If you wish me to do so in future, as you suggest, I must ask for specific advice.
5) I referred to Ms Clare Short as an "obscene racist Nazi war criminal". Firstly it is a matter of law that anybody involved in planning or launching an aggressive war is a war criminal, as I proved she had done & the other points were similarly proven (& have not been disputed by you). Even if it is the case of C4 that people should not mention the effects of the law what I said about Ms Short was not as grave a criticism as that of a member of the racial "Untermensch" (i.e. ex-President Milosevic) about whom neither C4 nor anybody else has produced serious evidence. If, as you say, you wish me to stay within your guidelines, it is necessary for you to produce your guidelines. About whom, other than former cabinet members, is it impermissible to ever mention proven criminal activities. About which racial groups, other than the "Untermensch" (Slavs, Jews, Gypsies) is any sort of libel, no matter how obscene, to be supported by C4?
I would like it to be possible for myself, or indeed others of conscience, to participate on the C4 discussion group. I am prepared to avoid telling truths which C4 finds politically unacceptable but am not willing to lie. If you can answer these points about your guidelines it may be possible to progress.
I just love your writing style. That letter to C4 just cracked me up!
It may interest you to know that I have been contacted by Ms. Tadic in the last few days (yes, the very same Ms. Tadic whom was in an automobile accident and ended up in a life threatening coma in February 2006 whilst miraculously appearing on SBS' "Dateline" current affairs program at the very same time with not a word being said by SBS about her accident).
I haven't replied to her yet but thought I should let you know since I don't know whether bringing up the subject of her miraculous recovery from a coma in the space of a few days would be an appropriate response (or the fact that the internet protocol address of "Mr. Stanford's" e-mails came from Sydney when they should have come from a remote outback mining town in New South Wales)
What do you suggest would be an appropriate title for a post on my blog? How does this sound?
"SBS journo miraculously recovers from coma after horrific autmobile crash - does overseas stories for current affairs program THE VERY SAME WEEK and makes a total IDIOT and ASS out of herself on the internet!"
Neil, please note the above is not for publication as I don't want Ms. Tadic to see this JUST YET (until after you decide what the appropriate course of action should be).
"Lemuel" is very similar in his opinions to "Fil2" on the Channel 4 discussion forum - he keeps using HRW and the Guardian as a source of "truth" on Milosevic and Yugoslavia.
Of course, Channel 4's "community discussion forum" is where my comments are consistently CENSORED by the Channel 4 "moderators" in the best traditions of Orwell's 1984 "Ministry of Truth" (e.g., I constantly get a message saying: "Unfortunately your message contains one or more trigger words" every time I try to make a post on Milosevic's murder by NATO and the associated disinformation propagated by the Guardian, ITN and BBC).
At least TCS only censored the word "Nazis" in my post (they replaced it with five asterisks)but otherwise published the entire post including all URL website addresses.
George Soros' Human Rights Watch: supporter of Genocidal Balkan Nazis
"Those were detailed accounts..."
"Detailed accounts"? Detailed accounts by whom exactly? Ahh, yes. That's right, I forgot. You gave us the "Human Rights Watch" website as a source. "Detailed accounts" by George Soros' US government and transnational US corporation connected "Human Rights Watch" disinformation apparatus. George Soros, billionaire financier, convicted insider trading criminal and persistent meddler in Eastern European countries' internal democratic political processes since the collapse of communism in 1989.
Yes indeed, we have, courtesy of Mr. Soros' propaganda outfit, HRW, many "detailed accounts of twisting of the facts,distortions and outright fabrications: in other words LIES on behalf of the US government and US government elite connected transnational corporations.
What a remarkable coincidence! “Human Rights Watch” as a staunch defender of "human rights" also supported the Alija Izetbegovic ("There can be no peace or co-existence with the Islamic faith and non-Islamic faith and political institutions")SDA party Islamist Nazis in Bosnia, the Franjo Tudjman ("Hitler's New Order could be justified by the need to be rid of the Jews" and "Genocide is not only permitted it also recommended-even commanded by the word of the Almighty-whenever it is useful for the survival...and spreading of the one and only correct faith") HDZ Ustasha Nazis in Croatia and the child-sex slavery trafficking, #1 European heroin smuggling, KLA Islamist Nazi ("We do everything with the knife")Albanian mafia in Kosovo,in their mass murder & ethnic cleansing of over half a million Serbs from Croatia & Krajina from 1990 to 1995, 1.2 million from Bosnia Herzegovina from 1992 to 1995 and 290,000 from Kosovo from 1999 to the present (all done under UN/NATO supervision).
Hmmm…does anyone see a pattern here?
While the alleged headquarters of "ethnic cleansing" - Milosevic's Serbia - gave refuge to not only over a million Serbs who were cleansed by the Ustasha genocidal Nazi Tudjman-led Croats and Islamo-fascist Izetbegovic-led Muslims but also gave refuge to at least three hundred thousand Bosnian muslims and Croats fleeing the fighting between the Tudjman HDZ Croats and Izetbegovic SDA Muslims when these parties fell out in 1993, where these Bosnian Muslim and Croat refugees were given food,shelter and clothing for years (whilst under draconian US-imposed UN sanctions) by the country supposedly led by someone whom the Guardian and ITN claimed was the "Butcher of the Balkans" and wanted to create an "ethnically pure Greater Serbia".
The "results speak for themselves". Indeed!
Of course, our ever "trustworthy" and "impartial" multi-billion dollar mega-transnational corporation-controlled infotainment "news media" who of course aren't really interested in such mundane matters as profits and ratings, can be relied upon to inform us, the so called "masses", of "all the facts".
For more factual background on that corrupt George Soros funded pro-Islamist Nazi disinformation “NGO” known as “Human Rights Watch”(NGO: acronym for "Non-Governmental Organization". I wonder why they had to invent a name like "non-governmental organization"? Its kind of like saying: "Hi, my name's Jack the Ripper and I'm not a murderer, you know")
“The Circle of Deception:Mapping the Human Rights Crowd in the Balkans”
by Gilles d’Aymery
“Our Masters of Propaganda: Washington pulls out the stops in its own propaganda war”
by Stephen Gowans
"WHY 'HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH' IS GUNNING FOR MACEDONIA"
The Srebrenica atrocity video & Natasa Kandic's Humanitarian Law Center - George Soros' & NATO's Propaganda Factory of Lies