Click to get your own widget

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

MILOSEVIC MURDER

Pete North whose blog has been mentioned before has sent this which I think goes into a usefully greater amount of detail on the poisoning of Milosevic:

You are quite correct in your deductions since it is logically consistent with the evidence.

Based on the evidence provided by the ICTY themselves (some of it clearly inadvertant as a result of their clumsy coverup in the immediate aftermath of his death) i.e., public statements from ICTY officials (doctors/toxicologists) that they performed blood tests on January 12 which revealed the presence of the Leprosy drug 'Rifampicine' in Milosevic's blood but kept it secret from Milosevic,his doctors,lawyers and the entire world for TWO MONTHS until March 7, is clear evidence of foul play on the part of officials in the ICTY.

The fact that the ICTY had to change their story repeatedly resulting in numerous self- contradictory and inconsistent statements also points to a clear coverup.

For example, once the Dutch NOS TV station revealed certain facts soon after Milosevic's death - especially that Milosevic had a blood test on January 12 - which the ICTY doctors themselves admitted was performed in order to find out why Milosevic's heart medication wasn't working - and yet failed to tell anyone in the world including Milosevic himself until March 7 - and yet he dies three short days after writing a letter to the Russian embassy complaining of being poisoned.

The constantly changing stories by ICTY officials - all contradictory of one another - given for his death were also highly suspicious.

They first said it was "natural causes", then said "possibly suicide", then they said he took the "wrong medicine" - without explaining how he could have possibly taken the medicine without them knowing - since he was always closely watched and was ONLY given medicine by the prison dispensary in the presence of armed guards.

Then they changed their story yet again by claiming that he must have been "poisoning himself in secret" in a "complex plot to escape to Russia" - even though this necessitated the involvement of his lawyers,doctors, the Russian government and even the ICTY ITSELF (since it was known Milosevic was under strict 24/7 Video surveillance & ALL medicine as indicated previously had to be taken from the prison dispensary in the presence of armed prison guards then how on earth could he be "poisoning himself" in secret?!)

The "poisoning himself in secret" story just didn't make any sense; realizing the absurdity, the ICTY offials simply changed their story yet again and LIED by making the ludicrous claim that he WASN'T monitored 24/7 and that "alcohol and other drugs" were being "smuggled in" to the prison for months before his death!!

But since this necessitated knowing involvement on the part of ICTY officials/guards, they had to change their story yet again by claiming that though the prison guards knew about this alleged smuggling of alcohol and drugs for months,somehow,because of sheer "incompetence", nothing was done about it by the higher ups (i.e the judges/prosecutors) and Milosevic was happily able to poison himself for months on end (and presumably also get drunk)!


The fact that soon after Milosevic's death the Dutch NOS TV station revealed that the ICTY ADMITTED that they KNEW about the presence of the Leprosy drug in his blood since January 12 - but supposedly did nothing about it for two entire months really threw a spanner in the works. This is where the cover up simply fell apart and blew a massive hole in the ICTY's initial "we didn't know he was poisoning himself so couldn't do anything about it" story.

Someone INSIDE the ICTY had to administering the Leprosy drug to Milosevic covertly without his knowledge and that was clearly revealed in the complaint letter that Milosevic wrote to the Russian embassy on March 8 after he received the blood test report -the day before - on March 7 -TWO MONTHS late.

Since in this letter Milosevic makes clear that the ICTY has repeatedly refused to let him go to Russia for heart surgery (even as late as his last appeal of February 24,2006 his request for medical treatment was denied)Milosevic pointed out that Russian specialists would quickly detect the Leprosy drug in a routine blood test - and thus clearly PROVE his poisoning by the ICTY - is it any surprise that the letter doesn't get delivered until AFTER his death?

Then they changed their story yet again and said that Milosevic WASN'T poisoned because they found no PRESCRIBED drugs in "toxic concentrations". How cute. Meaning he wasn't poisoned by the medicines he was SUPPOSED to be taking.

Even though ICTY officials admit that the Leprosy drug, 'Rifampicine', is an UNPRESCRIBED drug which apart from interfering with (i.e., blocking) heart medication - in effect acting as a POISON - it also quickly dissipates from the body leaving no trace of its presence (which they themselves admit) they still had the audacity to attempt to mislead the public by twisting the facts to make it sound as if he just simply wasn't poisoned in any way at all.


The fact that the ICTY blood test report of January 12 did not get delivered to Milosevic until March 7 - two months late - causing him to write his very concerned letter on March 8, outlining his grave fears about being poisoned, and the fact that his MArch 8 lettr did not get delivered to the Russian embassy until well AFTER Milosevic's death speaks volumes about who the only murderer could possibly be: NATO.

Since NATO have on numerous occasions publically admitted that they own - and ipso facto - control the ICTY, it can also be proved by the fact that Clinton's former "peace envoy", Richard Holbrooke was even able to intervene recently directly with the president of the ICTY on behalf of an ICTY-indicted KLA mass murderer, Mr.Ramush Haradinaj, to have Mr. Haradinaj released from The Hague prison without him having to even face trial - let alone be convicted for his crimes - also speaks volumes about what kind of "court" the ICTY truly is.

Comments:
Hi Neil,

Here's some very interesting additional evidence from the 'mainstream' press:

In fact the ICTY claimed in the media report below that they supposedly "knew" that Milosevic was taking Unprescribed medication (the Leprosy drug,Rifampicine) which was allegedly "smuggled in" by Milosevic SINCE 2004(!), but nevertheless the ICTY officials utterly fail to explain why the alleged self-poisoning by Milosevic was not prevented - for up to two years - since it was supposedly causing the ICTY a massive headache by needlessly causing numerous disruptions, thus extending his 'trial'[?!]

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,18482164-2703,00.html

And if you thought that official ICTY story didn't make any sense, how about this one:

Recently, as of April 5,2006, we are informed by the Dutch Public Prosecutor's Office that ICTY officials supposedly discovered back in December 2005(!), that Milosevic had Unprescribed medicines in his prison cell but we are expected to believe, the ICTY officials/guards who allegedly found these Unprescribed drugs failed to do anything about it!! [They even claim that on March 8 - the day Milosevic wrote his concerned letter to the Russian embassy expressing his fear about being poisoned and a mere 3 days before he dies - ICTY officials supposedly "demanded that Milosevic's lawyers should explain what was happening"]

So, ipso facto, if we are to believe this ICTY story, the ICTY officials supposedly allowed Milosevic to deliberately draw out the 'proceedings': needlessly wasting the ICTY's time by Milosevic deliberately poisoning himself with Leprosy drugs that they even discovered in his prison cell as early as December 2005:

"Information from the Tribunal has shown that in December 2005 medicines, which had not been prescribed, were found in the cell of Mr. Milosevic."

http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/news/nfi040506.htm

Maybe the NATO-owned ICTY officials should be the ones doing the explaining? Like why it took them 2 whole months to deliver the blood test report to Milosevic showing the presence of the Leprost drug, if indeed he was deliberately poisoning himself since 2004, and which the ICTY even found physical evidence of in his prison cell 3 months prior in December,2005?

ICTY officials would -if the corporate media were honest and doing their proper job - have a lot of explaining to do.

**********************************************************************

Press Release

Di Stefano will indict De Ponte for murder of Milosevic

"In late 2005 an application was made for President Milosevic to be treated in a specialist hospital in Russia. The Russian Government furnished irrevocable guarantees ensuring he would be treated and that he would be returned to The Hague upon the treatment being completed. It was expected as in any normal country that such an application would have been accepted especially that Russia is a member of the Security Council.

Primarily owing to the Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte's vehement opposition the Tribunal refused the application and thus it was know that refusal was a death sentence.

It follows that I will respect the 40 days mourning as per the Orthodox Religion commands. After which it is my intention to, in any jurisdiction possible, raise an indictment for murder against Carla Del Ponte who had failed to bring even a prima facia case against President Milosevic and thus chose the alternative in opposing an application to which she knew would condemn President Milosevic to death.

When one considers that other detainees including an indicted person from the KLA receiving and being admitted to bail and comparing such to how President Milosevic was treated leads one to the ultimate sad conclusion that an otherwise brilliant Prosecutor is guilty of his murder.

I must also call upon the Serbian Government now to allow the funeral and burial of President Milosevic in his home town and guar
 
Hi Neil,

Here's some very interesting additional evidence from the 'mainstream' press:

In fact the ICTY claimed in the media report below that they supposedly "knew" that Milosevic was taking Unprescribed medication (the Leprosy drug,Rifampicine) which was allegedly "smuggled in" by Milosevic SINCE 2004(!), but nevertheless the ICTY officials utterly fail to explain why the alleged self-poisoning by Milosevic was not prevented - for up to two years - since it was supposedly causing the ICTY a massive headache by needlessly causing numerous disruptions, thus extending his 'trial'[?!]

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,18482164-2703,00.html

And if you thought that official ICTY story didn't make any sense, how about this one:

Recently, as of April 5,2006, we are informed by the Dutch Public Prosecutor's Office that ICTY officials supposedly discovered back in December 2005(!), that Milosevic had Unprescribed medicines in his prison cell but we are expected to believe, the ICTY officials/guards who allegedly found these Unprescribed drugs failed to do anything about it!! [They even claim that on March 8 - the day Milosevic wrote his concerned letter to the Russian embassy expressing his fear about being poisoned and a mere 3 days before he dies - ICTY officials supposedly "demanded that Milosevic's lawyers should explain what was happening"]

So, ipso facto, if we are to believe this ICTY story, the ICTY officials supposedly allowed Milosevic to deliberately draw out the 'proceedings': needlessly wasting the ICTY's time by Milosevic deliberately poisoning himself with Leprosy drugs that they even discovered in his prison cell as early as December 2005:

"Information from the Tribunal has shown that in December 2005 medicines, which had not been prescribed, were found in the cell of Mr. Milosevic."

http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/news/nfi040506.htm

Maybe the NATO-owned ICTY officials should be the ones doing the explaining? Like why it took them 2 whole months to deliver the blood test report to Milosevic showing the presence of the Leprost drug, if indeed he was deliberately poisoning himself since 2004, and which the ICTY even found physical evidence of in his prison cell 3 months prior in December,2005?

ICTY officials would -if the corporate media were honest and doing their proper job - have a lot of explaining to do.

**********************************************************************

Press Release

Di Stefano will indict De Ponte for murder of Milosevic

"In late 2005 an application was made for President Milosevic to be treated in a specialist hospital in Russia. The Russian Government furnished irrevocable guarantees ensuring he would be treated and that he would be returned to The Hague upon the treatment being completed. It was expected as in any normal country that such an application would have been accepted especially that Russia is a member of the Security Council.

Primarily owing to the Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte's vehement opposition the Tribunal refused the application and thus it was know that refusal was a death sentence.

It follows that I will respect the 40 days mourning as per the Orthodox Religion commands. After which it is my intention to, in any jurisdiction possible, raise an indictment for murder against Carla Del Ponte who had failed to bring even a prima facia case against President Milosevic and thus chose the alternative in opposing an application to which she knew would condemn President Milosevic to death.

When one considers that other detainees including an indicted person from the KLA receiving and being admitted to bail and comparing such to how President Milosevic was treated leads one to the ultimate sad conclusion that an otherwise brilliant Prosecutor is guilty of his murder.

I must also call upon the Serbian Government now to allow the funeral and burial of President Milosevic in his home town and guar
 
Hi Neil,

Here's some very interesting additional evidence from the mainstream press:

In fact the ICTY claimed in the media report below that they supposedly "knew" that Milosevic was taking Unprescribed medication (the Leprosy drug,Rifampicine) which was allegedly "smuggled in" by Milosevic SINCE 2004(!), but nevertheless the ICTY officials utterly fail to explain why the alleged self-poisoning by Milosevic was not prevented - for up to two years - since it was supposedly causing the ICTY a massive headache by needlessly causing numerous disruptions, thus extending his 'trial'[?!]

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,18482164-2703,00.html

And if you thought that official ICTY story didn't make any sense, how about this one:

Recently, as of April 5,2006, we are informed by the Dutch Public Prosecutor's Office that ICTY officials supposedly discovered back in December 2005(!), that Milosevic had Unprescribed medicines in his prison cell but we are expected to believe, the ICTY officials/guards who allegedly found these Unprescribed drugs failed to do anything about it!! [They even claim that on March 8 - the day Milosevic wrote his concerned letter to the Russian embassy expressing his fear about being poisoned and a mere 3 days before he dies - ICTY officials supposedly "demanded that Milosevic's lawyers should explain what was happening"]

So, ipso facto, if we are to believe this ICTY story, the ICTY officials supposedly allowed Milosevic to deliberately draw out the 'proceedings': needlessly wasting the ICTY's time by Milosevic deliberately poisoning himself with Leprosy drugs that they even discovered in his prison cell as early as December 2005:

"Information from the Tribunal has shown that in December 2005 medicines, which had not been prescribed, were found in the cell of Mr. Milosevic."

http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/news/nfi040506.htm

Maybe the NATO-owned ICTY officials should be the ones doing the explaining? Like why it took them 2 whole months to deliver the blood test report to Milosevic showing the presence of the Leprosy drug, if indeed he was deliberately poisoning himself since 2004, and which the ICTY even found physical evidence of in his prison cell 3 months prior in December,2005?

ICTY officials would -if the corporate media were honest and doing their proper job - have a lot of explaining to do.

**********************************************************************

Press Release

Di Stefano will indict Del Ponte for murder of Milosevic

"In late 2005 an application was made for President Milosevic to be treated in a specialist hospital in Russia. The Russian Government furnished irrevocable guarantees ensuring he would be treated and that he would be returned to The Hague upon the treatment being completed. It was expected as in any normal country that such an application would have been accepted especially that Russia is a member of the Security Council.

Primarily owing to the Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte's vehement opposition the Tribunal refused the application and thus it was know that refusal was a death sentence.

It follows that I will respect the 40 days mourning as per the Orthodox Religion commands. After which it is my intention to, in any jurisdiction possible, raise an indictment for murder against Carla Del Ponte who had failed to bring even a prima facia case against President Milosevic and thus chose the alternative in opposing an application to which she knew would condemn President Milosevic to death.

When one considers that other detainees including an indicted person from the KLA receiving and being admitted to bail and comparing such to how President Milosevic was treated leads one to the ultimate sad conclusion that an otherwise brilliant Prosecutor is guilty of his murder.

I must also call upon the Serbian Government now to allow the funeral and burial of President Milosevic in his home town and guarantee safe passage to his family to which my sympathies are extended. It cannot be overlooked that within days of the suicide of Mr Babic no proper controls were made of the detention unit and thus an independant investigation must be held into the cause of death and more important the time of death. President Milosevic died a wholly innocent man!"

Giovanni Di Stefano

http://www.studiolegaleinternazionale.com/news/ourNews/20060311Milosevic.php4?PHPSESSID=62b8522ba2d50a0d2f62b7cd430bbe10
 
Hi Neil,

Have you read all three of the following?

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=/SpecialReports/archive/200603/SPE20060322a.html

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=HER20051229&articleId=1667

http://www.mediacleansing.com
(a marvellous new site launched to promote the book that exposes the Globalist bastards'lies about the Serbs & Milosevic - a book which ISSA President,Gregory Copley states: "should be the basis for both US Congressional and independent media enquiries")

Lets hope that one day the Globalist Western Nazi bastards & their media whores (like CNN's Christiane Amanpour) are tried by the ordinary people of the world for 4.5 years and then poisoned to death (like they did to silence Milosevic) for their horrendous lies & crimes against humanity.


Enjoy!!

Pete.
 
Neil,

It's interesting to note how many US/NATO corporate media claims are accepted as "given" - even by some progressives.



Use of phrases such as "...of course there is no question that Serb forces carried out most of the atrocities and ethnic cleansing in Kosovo" or "Yes Milosevic was a brute/war criminal/thug/tyrant/tinpot dictator, but hey, the US/NATO power elites on both sides of the political aisle were just as bad" and other such unsubstantiated nonsense.

Then there is the oft-repeated Goebbels style 'big lie' that "well,yes, the US/NATO backed Islamist SDA Izetbegovic faction Bosniak muslims & Fascist HDZ Tudjman pro-Ustasha faction were guilty of atrocities against Serbs (e.g. the cleansing of 600,000 Serbs in the Krajina province from 1990 to 1995 and the cleansing of over a million more Serbs from Bosnia & Kosovo) but the Serbs initiated atrocities first, in a systematic program like the Nazis (e.g. "Operation Horseshoe"), therefore the Serbs deserved what they got".

The US/NATO corporate media spin concerning Kosovo (a la CNN's Christiane Amanpour) from late 1999 is somewhat akin to this:



"Hi, my name's Wesley. Well, I just had to blow up my best friend's next-door neighbor's house and kill John's wife,dog and his five children while they were sleeping in it,which I didn't mean to do of course, I just meant to kill John, because I heard from this out of town guy that my best friend's neighbor, John, was a really bad guy - a child molestor and drug pusher. I heard he even raped his pet parrot. I mean it was kind of common knowledge, in that neighborhood you know,about how bad John was. Okay,fair enough, I found out later that my best friend's other neighbor Steve, and the out of town guy Bill, did exaggerate somewhat: he admitted John wasn't really a child molestor or drug pusher and didn't rape his parrot after all,and that Steve was actually having a 10 year long dispute with my neighbor John over land holdings adjoining a common fence in their backyards,and yep sure, I admit, Steve blew up John's car,raped his wife and killed John's dog in revenge after it crapped on Steve's lawn two years ago-but John was a child molestor and rapist himself, so I figured hey, what the heck,John deserved what he and his wife got.

But at the time the out of town guy,Bill, as well as Steve, seemed so sincere about John being a child molestor, drug pusher and parrot rapist, that I had no reason to doubt their word!! I mean give me a break will you! Even if just one of these charges about John was true, I couldn't stand by and do nothing, could I? I mean my best friend having to endure living next to either a possible child molestor or drug pusher or parrot rapist -I mean,all the more so, when I had so much TNT lying around the house not being used - especially when one day, my wife said: "honey, what's the point of having all this TNT lying about the house if you ain't gonna use it?"

So I took my wife's advice, took the TNT out at 3AM and blew up John's house while he was sleeping. I mean,I never meant to kill his wife,dog,parrot and five children, you know. I just meant to stop him from committing his vile deeds. I mean, you have to remember, I was personally told by Steve and Bill -who are both honest reputable journalists that he was a real,real terrible bad guy who threatened to murder Steve's family,and it was common knowledge in the neighborhood that John was a bad guy,I mean everyone was saying it, so what else could I do? It was the only moral thing at the time to do you know, to stop John from molesting all those little children, raping his parrot and selling drugs.



In 2006, this is changed to:



"John died today in the state penitentiary via lethal injection with poison. John was a serial killer,serial rapist, child molestor, drug pusher,parrot and poodle rapist guilty of murdering Steve and Bill and everyone else in his entire neighbourhood and setting fire to nine hundred houses in the adjoining neighborhoods and surrounding suburbs. Wesley regrets that John's many, many victims including his wife, dog, five children, pet parrot and the neighborhood's poodles will never see justice."



The fact that this latest corporate media portrayal by CNN's Christiane Amanpour of the late Milosevic and the Yugoslav conflict has ZERO evidence/justification to support it (e.g.,the Tudjman HDZ Croats & Izetbegovic SDA Bosniaks were publicly committed to genocide of the Serbs BEFORE the outbreak of hostilities in 1991/92 by openly publishing articles and making statements in PUBLIC praising the WW2 Nazi SS /Ustasha personalities & policies of genocide against the Serbs,then by threatening the Serbs with genocide directly by firing them from their jobs, forcing Serbs to carry an identity card with the number "3" identifying them as Serbs, murdering them in their homes and burning their houses down to force them to leave by the tens of thousands as early as late 1990) is of course never mentioned by CNN.



Regards,



Pete.
 
"It is likely more than coincidence that only days before Milosevic's death, a shake-up occurred in Kosovo and a Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) commander [Agim Ceku] was installed as the new Prime Minister."
********************************************************************************************************************************************

"Milosevic Murder Is Flashpoint"

Milosevic was tacitly murdered "to create a grave crisis in relations between the United States and Western Europe on the one side, and Russia and Asian powers on the other." ("LaRouche: Milosevic Murder To Trigger East-West Conflict")

http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2006/2006_10-19/2006-12/pdf/4-10_612.pdf


Kosovo, part of the former Yugoslavia, is "a crucial junction in the drugs-and-weapons trade in Eurasia." What Berkeley professor Peter Dale Scott calls "the Drug Meta-Group" is entrenched there. Inevitably, along with illegal narcotics, there is a Black Market in weapons. It is likely more than coincidence that only days before Milosevic's death, a shake-up occurred in Kosovo and a Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) commander was installed as the new Prime Minister.


In 1991, following the break-up of the Soviet Union, there had been hope that the West would nurture the newly-emerged republics toward revitalized economies. Instead, greed-impassioned vultures descended upon the region and plundered it. What Steinberg calls a "London-Paris Synarchist axis" provoked Balkan crises, so as "to sabotage the opportunities for a new, post-Cold War era of East-West cooperation."


Russia has an historical connection to what it calls "the Near Abroad." This includes, tangentially, the Balkans, writes Rachel Douglas. ("Hot Spots Flare in Russia's 'Near Abroad'") She lists regional tinder boxes experiencing flare-ups. Among them are Belarus, Ukraine, and Kosovo. In Belarus, there seems to have been "an American-backed plot" to overthrow President Alexander Lukashenko. In Ukraine, it is alleged that CIA-friendly Victor Yushchenko of "Orange Revolution" fame permitted his government to collude with the West for secret prisons. Russian president Vladimir Putin has frowned upon a push for Kosovo autonomy. It adds up to a precipitated crisis of some sort, if Steinberg (op. cit.) is correct.


These Russian developments occur concurrent with a startling shift in U.S./Iranian relations. "While the whole world focuses, even obsesses, over the bellicose propaganda rantings of both the US and Iran, there are signs that a completely different trend is underway," wrote Michael C. Ruppert yesterday. (http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/032706_rapprochment_summary.shtml) In "Rapprochement?", Ruppert headlines that "Not Only Will the US Not Attack Iran, It Looks Like the Biggest Thaw in US/Iranian Relations Since 1979 is Suddenly and Inexplicably Underway".


Ruppert is stunned. "What gives?" he asks. The answer could be a sudden shift in alliances, flowing from an awakening Russian Bear, stirred up by hornets from the London-Paris Synarchist axis.

http://www.shout.net/~bigred/MilosevicFlashpoint.html
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

British Blogs.