Monday, April 10, 2006
MILOSEVIC MURDER - LORD BONOMY IMPLICATED
We have been told that the Dutch authorities have cleared the Milosevic death of being murder. While this is indeed the headline position the detail is different.Their statement can be found here
The important points are firstly that they accept the veracity of the previous blood tests, lastly in January, showing he had ingested rifampicine & secondly the finding that
Prima Faci the assumption must be that the authorities who had control over him were the murderers.The only alternative would seem to be suicide which, at least using this method, is non-credible.
The question of whether judges Robinson, Bonomy & Kwon were personally involved revolves on the fact that they had personal responsibility for deciding if he would be allowed to go to Russia for medical treatment. If he had gone it seems likely that the Russian doctors would have performed blood tests & been able to prove attempted murder. That being the case it would be necessary for the murderers to know, at least several days ahead of time, of any decision to allow him to go for medical treatment. The only people who could definitely be sure that he would not be allowed to go for medical treatment were the judges. Thus they must have told the plotters it was safe to proceed because their "judicial" decisions were already stitched up.
Bearing in mind that Lord Bonomy is a judge in the Scottish court the fact that there is a murderer sitting on the Scottish Bench has unfortunate implications.
The important points are firstly that they accept the veracity of the previous blood tests, lastly in January, showing he had ingested rifampicine & secondly the finding that
The NFI furthermore has concluded that it is not likely that rifampicine had been taken or administered several days prior to the decease.All this latter suggests is that he had not received this poison in the previous few days. There is therefore no dispute whatsoever that he had been poisoned by this odorless, tasteless & unusual poison. This obviously could not have been done accidentally
Prima Faci the assumption must be that the authorities who had control over him were the murderers.The only alternative would seem to be suicide which, at least using this method, is non-credible.
The question of whether judges Robinson, Bonomy & Kwon were personally involved revolves on the fact that they had personal responsibility for deciding if he would be allowed to go to Russia for medical treatment. If he had gone it seems likely that the Russian doctors would have performed blood tests & been able to prove attempted murder. That being the case it would be necessary for the murderers to know, at least several days ahead of time, of any decision to allow him to go for medical treatment. The only people who could definitely be sure that he would not be allowed to go for medical treatment were the judges. Thus they must have told the plotters it was safe to proceed because their "judicial" decisions were already stitched up.
Bearing in mind that Lord Bonomy is a judge in the Scottish court the fact that there is a murderer sitting on the Scottish Bench has unfortunate implications.
Comments:
<< Home
You are making a serious charge based on no evidence. I wonder if you have seen:
Expert warns of more chatroom libel awards
James Sturcke
Wednesday March 22, 2006
A landmark legal ruling ordering a woman to pay £10,000 in damages for defamatory comments posted on an internet chatroom site could trigger a rush of similar lawsuits, a leading libel lawyer warned today.
Michael Smith, a Ukip activist who stood for the Portsmouth North seat last year, became the first person to win damages yesterday after being accused of being a "sex offender" and "racist blogger" on a Yahoo! discussion site.
Mr Smith, 53, from Fareham in Hampshire, sued Tracy Williams, of Oldham, for comments posted after she joined a rightwing online forum in 2002.
Judge Alistair MacDuff said in the high court that Ms Williams was "particularly abusive" and "her statements demonstrated that ... she had no intention of stopping her libellous and defamatory behaviour"…
Although ISPs have paid out for hosting defamatory comments, this case is thought to be the first time an individual has been found to have committed libel on a internet chat site.
"The obvious and immediate potential ramification is that there will be more cases like this," said Richard Shillito, a partner at the law firm Farrer & Co. "One sees on these sites particularly unrestrained comments that people make in the heat of the moment without thinking of the legal consequences.
"A lot of people post anonymously but it is possible to find out people's identity. I think people should read this judgment as a warning to be more careful about their comments."
More on this at:
http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1737001,00.html
Expert warns of more chatroom libel awards
James Sturcke
Wednesday March 22, 2006
A landmark legal ruling ordering a woman to pay £10,000 in damages for defamatory comments posted on an internet chatroom site could trigger a rush of similar lawsuits, a leading libel lawyer warned today.
Michael Smith, a Ukip activist who stood for the Portsmouth North seat last year, became the first person to win damages yesterday after being accused of being a "sex offender" and "racist blogger" on a Yahoo! discussion site.
Mr Smith, 53, from Fareham in Hampshire, sued Tracy Williams, of Oldham, for comments posted after she joined a rightwing online forum in 2002.
Judge Alistair MacDuff said in the high court that Ms Williams was "particularly abusive" and "her statements demonstrated that ... she had no intention of stopping her libellous and defamatory behaviour"…
Although ISPs have paid out for hosting defamatory comments, this case is thought to be the first time an individual has been found to have committed libel on a internet chat site.
"The obvious and immediate potential ramification is that there will be more cases like this," said Richard Shillito, a partner at the law firm Farrer & Co. "One sees on these sites particularly unrestrained comments that people make in the heat of the moment without thinking of the legal consequences.
"A lot of people post anonymously but it is possible to find out people's identity. I think people should read this judgment as a warning to be more careful about their comments."
http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1737001,00.html
# posted by 
: April 18, 2006
: April 18, 2006
The evidence that Lord bonamy acted as a judge in this "trial" is clear.
The evidence that the "judges" were the only ones who had the authority to immediately send him for medical treatment is equally conclusive.
I think you misunderstand the meaning of the word "implicated". It means only that there is a case to answer that he was involved. It is possible that the murderers will ultimately say that they knew their poisoning would not be tested for in Russia because the other 2 judges had said it & Bonamy was an innocent. There may be other possibilities & if you, or indeed his Lordship, wish to say what they are I would be pleased.
The evidence that the "judges" were the only ones who had the authority to immediately send him for medical treatment is equally conclusive.
I think you misunderstand the meaning of the word "implicated". It means only that there is a case to answer that he was involved. It is possible that the murderers will ultimately say that they knew their poisoning would not be tested for in Russia because the other 2 judges had said it & Bonamy was an innocent. There may be other possibilities & if you, or indeed his Lordship, wish to say what they are I would be pleased.
What It’s Like to Chill Out With Whom the World Considers the Most Ruthless Men in the World Ratko Mladic, Radovan Karadzic and Goran Hadzic (+) Confessions of a Female War Crimes Investigator
Retrospectively, it was all so simple, natural and matter of fact being on a boat restaurant in Belgrade, sitting with, laughing, drinking a two hundred bottle of wine and chatting about war and peace while Ratko Mladic held my hand. Mladic, a man considered the world’s most ruthless war criminal since Adolf Hitler, still at large and currently having a five million dollar bounty on his head for genocide by the international community. Yet there I was with my two best friends at the time, a former Serbian diplomat, his wife, and Ratko Mladic just chilling. There was no security, nothing you’d ordinarily expect in such circumstances. Referring to himself merely as, Sharko; this is the story of it all came about.
http://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/what-it-s-like-to-chill-out-with-whom-the-rest-of-the-world-considers-as-the-most-ruthless-men-in-the-world-ratko-mladic-and-radovan-karadzic-confessions-of-a-female-war-crimes-investigator
(Read My Entire Book Here For Free Now).
http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa
(Jill Starr's Entire American Expose Including the Secret Scanned Photo Documentary Evidence I Obtained From the CLOSED UN ICC Preparatory Meetings (2001)
http://lpcyu.instablogs.com/feed
(Jill Starr On Instablogs)
http://shops.half.ebay.com/raretofindreads
(Now Everyone Can Purchase My Rare Books)
===============================
International Relations Consultant & War Crimes Investigator
- War
- Peace
- Preventive Diplomatic Strategies
- International Law
- Charitable Causes
- International Business
- International Political Economy
- Human Rights - Politics
- War Crimes Investigations
- Anti-Terrorism
- Law Projects Center Funded Projects (YCICC) Internationally http://members.fortunecity.com/lpca1/
Retrospectively, it was all so simple, natural and matter of fact being on a boat restaurant in Belgrade, sitting with, laughing, drinking a two hundred bottle of wine and chatting about war and peace while Ratko Mladic held my hand. Mladic, a man considered the world’s most ruthless war criminal since Adolf Hitler, still at large and currently having a five million dollar bounty on his head for genocide by the international community. Yet there I was with my two best friends at the time, a former Serbian diplomat, his wife, and Ratko Mladic just chilling. There was no security, nothing you’d ordinarily expect in such circumstances. Referring to himself merely as, Sharko; this is the story of it all came about.
http://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/what-it-s-like-to-chill-out-with-whom-the-rest-of-the-world-considers-as-the-most-ruthless-men-in-the-world-ratko-mladic-and-radovan-karadzic-confessions-of-a-female-war-crimes-investigator
(Read My Entire Book Here For Free Now).
http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa
(Jill Starr's Entire American Expose Including the Secret Scanned Photo Documentary Evidence I Obtained From the CLOSED UN ICC Preparatory Meetings (2001)
http://lpcyu.instablogs.com/feed
(Jill Starr On Instablogs)
http://shops.half.ebay.com/raretofindreads
(Now Everyone Can Purchase My Rare Books)
===============================
International Relations Consultant & War Crimes Investigator
- War
- Peace
- Preventive Diplomatic Strategies
- International Law
- Charitable Causes
- International Business
- International Political Economy
- Human Rights - Politics
- War Crimes Investigations
- Anti-Terrorism
- Law Projects Center Funded Projects (YCICC) Internationally http://members.fortunecity.com/lpca1/
The corruption of such courts is demonstrated by the hague court's decision that it could not make judgement on the Kosovo war's legality because Yugoslavia was not a member of the UN at the time (having been expelled by the aggressors), while previously having said they could judge Bosnia's case against Yugoslavia despite Bosnia not being or ever having been a UN member.
Retroactive justification for Hess & co since in 1939 Poland wasn't a member of the UN so the Nuremburg trials could never take place ;-)
Post a Comment
Retroactive justification for Hess & co since in 1939 Poland wasn't a member of the UN so the Nuremburg trials could never take place ;-)
<< Home
